International Affairs
27 claims · evidence for and against, weighted by source quality
Debate of the day · International Affairsre-evaluated 11h ago
The United States can phase out military funding to Israel without weakening its broader strategic partnership with the country
Leaning yes, with caveats
In the news: Congress May Phase Out Billions in Military Funding to Israel—but Deepen Ties Another Way - Time Magazine · news.google.com
Supports 54%
Against 46%
Evidence balance — weighted by source quality, not votes · 10 arguments
The question is whether ending U.S. military funding to Israel could leave the wider strategic partnership—including diplomatic, intelligence, technological, and security cooperation—substantially intact, and the answer …
Join the debate →
All claims in International Affairs
The United States can phase out military funding to Israel without weakening its broader strategic partnership with the country
Leaning yes, with caveats
North Korea will deploy military personnel to support Russia’s war in Ukraine
Leaning yes
Imposing forced‑labour tariffs on imports reduces the prevalence of forced labour in the targeted economies
Leaning no, with caveats
The Falkland Islands (Malvinas) rightfully belong to Argentina
Leaning no, with caveats
U.S. economic sanctions against Iran are an effective means of changing Iranian government behavior
Depends on scope
A ceasefire negotiated through U.S. envoy diplomacy in Ukraine can last at least 12 months without binding security guarantees
Depends on scope
The United States cannot control the Strait of Hormuz
Leaning no, with caveats
Climate migration will be the defining crisis of the 2030s
Depends on scope
Whether governments should impose sanctions on individuals or entities involved in West Bank settlement activity
Leaning yes, with caveats
Reducing US foreign aid budgets negatively impacts global stability
Leaning yes, with caveats
China's economic slowdown alters global trade dynamics and commodity markets
Leaning yes
Climate change and economic instability are major drivers of recent shifts in global migration patterns
Leaning no
U.S. military attacks on Iran increase regional geopolitical instability
Leaning yes, with caveats
NATO's expansion and increased defense spending enhance European security
Depends on scope
Increased drone incursions near NATO borders raise the risk of military escalation with Russia
Leaning yes
Economic sanctions rarely achieve their stated goals
Depends on scope
Foreign aid does more harm than good
Depends on scope
A lasting ceasefire in Gaza cannot be achieved unless Hamas disarms before any agreement is reached
Leaning no
Arctic resource competition will lead to geopolitical tensions and conflicts
Depends on scope
The semiconductor supply chain should be prioritized as a national security interest
Yes
Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) will enhance financial inclusion globally
Depends on scope
China will overtake the US as the dominant global power
Depends on scope
The global order is fragmenting into competing blocs
Depends on scope
NATO expansion provoked the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Depends on scope
The United Nations is no longer fit for purpose
Leaning yes, with caveats
Water scarcity will cause more conflicts than oil ever did
Depends on scope
International sporting events intensify nationalism and prolong territorial disputes
Depends on scope
The evidence moved
North Korea will deploy military personnel to support Russia’s war in Ukraine
Leaning yes
The United States can phase out military funding to Israel without weakening its broader strategic partnership with the country
Leaning yes, with caveats
Whether governments should impose sanctions on individuals or entities involved in West Bank settlement activity
Leaning yes, with caveats